Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Opinions for the week of 5/23 - Wrap up and rebuttal

Just my point of view on a friend's opinion, I just thought I'd share it with you. Feel free to rebut.

----- Original Message -----
Subject: More...

As agreed, we will leave this to email alone.. I've spent about 6 hours comprising this, something I'm quite passionate about, obviously.

>The only thing that scares me is people that think like you...Oh, by the way I read the entire speech given by Robert Murdoch, unlike you and all you've done is support my position that you don't know what your talking about...You need to find another agenda, this one just ain't making it.........T

It's just not apparent to me why people are so myopic. There is just no reason why they don't read between the lines. Bush ADMITTED to using propaganda. Murdoch SAID the press thinks people are stupid. Encompassed within his whole statement, those things tend to stick out. Buried within an entire speech about how he thinks Fox/NewsCorp needs to advance, he said it. Just like Bush said that he is pushing propaganda in his speech for Social Security.

Now, I'm sure you ask of yourself.. Why can't he just let this rest? or, What is his problem with Bush? or, maybe even, What's his problem overall?

I answer of you, there is too much apathy amongst the majority of America, to the point where we only answer amongst the lies which we are given and, devastatingly worse, defend them. All along the watchtower, people are seen turning away from major networks and their source of information for good cause. Censorship. GE/NBC, Viacom/CBS, Disney/ABC, look at their donations and their kick-back.

Am I a socialist or "pinko commie"? No. That's why I refuse to come down on large corporations for "making money". I didn't have enough time in my latest rant to include this statement; Corporations are what keeps middle and lower America alive, without them, there would be no homes or food. The abuse of that power is what I speak of. I strongly suggest you read the works of Adolph Hitler (Mien Kampf) or, a more modern book like "48 Laws of Power", both of these books encompass within 200 [or so] pages what it takes to gain a "power" that is so amazing that I could barely handle it myself.

To reiterate, "48 Laws" is a great book. You can easily see how things are used against you and how you've used things of your own to gain the "upper hand" in any given situation.

So, why do I compare the president to Hitler? I think the answer comes pretty easily... Abuse of power. If you chose to read between the lines, the president ADMITTED that he uses propaganda. The press ADMITTED that they think we're "20% less likely to make good decisions" a.k.a. (in Murdoch's translation) "Stupid". This strikes me as odd because he also said this attitude would be the downfall of anyone holding this opinion and ratings for Fox News Channel continue to plummet.

Why you choose to make the speech by each of these "leaders" a generality instead of taking it "point by point" is reasonable. It's also reasonable to say that when you have a sore thumb, no matter what happens in your day, you still know it's sore. It's a small part of your body but you still know that one part of you is upsetting the "situation".

America, as a whole, has been brought up to believe that we are the greatest, most sovereign nation, without doubt and, are crucified for holding any other opinion, or jailed, for that matter. When the lies that we have been lead to believe by the press are exposed by sources outside where we "usually" get our news from become exploited, as arrogant Americans with myopic views, we will not hold anything to truth except the lies than we were sold with ferocity by whores in the media like Anne Coulter. It is against human psychology to agree to anything than what we truly hold deep in our hearts and we fear to question that depth for fear of ruining our precious views and simple lives. I call it arrogance and there may be many other names for it; plain and simple we are all guilty of this, myself included. What makes me feel the need to expose these truths, you ask? If you were sold a LIE in the name of shedding your brother's blood, wouldn't you be pissed off? It's a fact, George Bush LIED to us to engage in the war. "Q One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?
THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim." and my personal favorite,

I must ask of you; where do you get your news from? Do you still employ the larger media conglomerates as your source? If so, have you not seen how they are slowly fading away while moving over for the greater press called the Internet? These are serious questions I pose to you in great concern. You think I'm full of it, but do not offer me any retort as to why or how. I have given my dissertations of all of the above and noted reliable sources (such as, the ones they actually came from) but all I have heard in reply, no offense, is a half witted rebuttal that only includes remarks of dismay. I entrust within your intellect that you will engage me in this rebuttal with more intellect than telling me that I don't know what I'm talking about. It's not childish to debate these kind of topics. It's our civic duty. Moreover, it's our responsibility: enladen in our constitution. We don't need to agree but, there is one thing that's for sure.... If you're gonna tell me that I don't have a clue, I URGE you to prove me wrong with statistics and fact as I have equally done for you.

I understand that you have heritage of the Jewish persuasion. I only ask that you rebut why the world is up in arms (literally, arms) over the Zionistic control of Israel, or prove to me that Rabin was not assassinated by Sharon's henchmen for his (Sharon) fear of the Oslo Accord. If the Zionistic control of regions is not apparent, WHY, WHY, WHY are people protesting it by kicking a Styrofoam replica of the Israeli flag in half protesting the Zionist movement and presence? It's said to be an extremist point of view that's not really valid, but still, it's not been proven by anyone that it's not really going on; that would be impossible. Why is it that when people speak against Zionists that it's considered anti-Semitic? I speak not of Jewish people, I speak of Zionists. Another thing I urge of you, find one program on television in which Judaism is not boasted. There is nothing wrong with the religion, or it's people. It's the people controlling these statements that concerns me. Why do we have AIPAC? Why not have something for N. Korea? they have more of a threat to us than Israel. Why does Bush coddle to Sharon? Why do both of them get booed out of every uncontrolled USA venue? Why do the settlers not have control of their own land? They are Jewish, they are in Israel, this boggles me constantly. Why were there Israeli shells found near the site of a mass murder in Syria? Why won't MOSSAD answer to anybody?

Once again, I speak not of Judaism but ONLY of Zionistic protocol. .. The diatribe of our leaders in rebutting the existence of this shitty organization is far from decent. Why must Americans feel as if everything that's not in mainstream be considered communistic or anti-Semitic?

Zionists, Christians, they're both shoving their lifestyle in our face with brute force. Appointment of activist judges to the Supreme Court, one simple example of where we are headed. I can't believe the demon-crats applauded this appointment. "You can have your judges, just let us have our filibuster" (Quote from unnamed) seems just about accurate to me. Some extremist shoved some propaganda in my face last night by taping a quote from the bible to my door (private property). My views on religion may seem somewhat harsh but, I don't think that you can quite balance out the greed and perverse nature of modern organized religion. Molestation? Jesus Christ?!?!? Anywhere? Anywhere? No wonder our president is leading us into propaganda and shoving religion up our ass so hard that we're green in the eyes with it; he's preparing us for Armageddon. Just the other day he was quoted saying that "Nuclear weaponry need NOT be a last resort". So just what *IS* the last resort?

>and what lie did he tell in that speech........if your attempting to compare Bush with Goebbel's, it don't wash. period

You're absolutely right. HE didn't tell a lie, he just said he's "catapulting the propaganda"

Propaganda: (n) information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause

In this case, lies like the one stated above are his "cause". If you choose to disagree with the fact that these are lies and that "bad intelligence" was given, I refer you again to the "Downing Street Memo".

In closing; even though we have these discussions in email to remove the politic while we sit at the bar, I know that my statements have great effect in what you ultimately feel about me. These statements do comprise my structure but do not make me a bad person for speaking my mind. People have died for my freedom and you, yourself, have engaged in war for my freedoms. I am grateful for this but, also am spiteful towards a leader that is slowly dismantling our freedoms. Just yesterday a judge passed a law against parents from teaching their children certain religions in the state of Illinois. We must do our civic duty to ensure that the Bill of Rights and Constitution are upheld without sacrificing our freedoms. "When we sacrifice freedom for security, we will have neither" - Ben Franklin. I assure you, the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act was just a tester to see how much breathing room the government could have to violate the constitution.



Post a Comment

<< Home